Dear Sir / Madam,
I am writing to express
my dissatisfaction and deep disagreement with the policy, which
you lead as chief editor of the weekly supplement where you most
often use misleading photographs of women for all sorts of commercial
purposes.
I want to complain because
you fail to include true information about the item on sale. Instead,
you support the use of offensive photographs, untrue captions, inappropriate
suggestions, wrong connections, subtle / negative implications and
all sorts of other ways of selling.
I am enclosing two pictures
under the title "In need for vehicle?" for you to compare
your own photographs with those with other weekly magazines such
as "The word inside out". In this popular magazine the editor denounces
issue after issue that poverty-stricken people favour the existence
of dictators and that hunger is, today, the cheapest political weapon
to control a nation. Please note the critical view that the pictures
of those two women offer by providing a powerful contrast between
the 1st and the 3rd worlds.
In my opinion you should
work in the same line as 10 years ago when your magazine first came
to light. Could you try and display again the same rebellious spirits?
It is time something was done without further excuses such as "this
sells well". I would greatly appreciate it, if you did something
on the other lines than merely trying to increase/double every year's
profits.
Looking forward to seeing new signs of your old-but-hopefully- not-lost-yet
commitment,
Yours faithfully,
|