|
|
Getting To Know
An English-speaking Country
TEACHING NOTES & EVALUATION
Refer to this evaluation form when evaluating your students'
work...
| |
below
standard
1
|
standard
2
|
above
standard
3
|
outstanding
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Letter |
purpose
of letter not clear; disorganised; not all aspects of task included;
short; inaccurate; style and/or layout inappropriate |
purpose
of letter clear, and laid out in logical steps; content sufficient
for task; grammatical and lexical mistakes do not impede overall
intelligibility; style may be awkward but is not intrusive |
purpose
of letter clear, detailed , well argued, covering all main points;
few errors, and stylistically appropriate |
arguments
convincingly presented, original, even imaginative, well researched;
very accurate and wide ranging use of grammar and vocabulary; style
appropriate for purpose and audience |
| |
| Presentation |
presentation
confused and/or short and/or difficult to follow, poorly researched
and/or minimally illustrated, and/or under-rehearsed (in case of
oral presentation); work not well distributed between group members;
little apparent liaison or collaboration |
presentation
organised into stages, clearly illustrated and sufficiently detailed
to give a general idea; evidence of rehearsal and sufficient group
collaboration, even if workload not evenly distributed |
well
organised presentation, with clear and detailed outline of plan,
showing evidence of thorough research and rehearsal; attractively
illustrated; work well co-ordinated and evenly distributed |
presentation
painstakingly researched but presented in an engaging, even entertaining,
way; technically impressive, well resourced; even distribution of
work, each contribution harmoniously linked to make a coherent whole |
| |
| Postcard |
short,
insufficient coverage of all points, little or no linking; grammatical
and lexical errors make it difficult to decode message; style and/or
layout inappropriate |
short
but main points all covered and logically ordered; grammatical and
lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility; style may
be awkward but is not intrusive |
well-researched;
good range of points included, and cohesively linked; good standard
of accuracy and stylistic appropriacy; wide range of vocabulary |
information
highly credible showing evidence of detailed research; imaginative;
creative use of language to a high standard of accuracy and complexity;
style appropriate and layout correct |
| |
| Self-evaluation |
short,
clumsily written and/or lacking in self-awareness; inaccurate to
the point of unintelligibility |
sufficiently
detailed, balanced appraisal, covering all main points; grammatical
and lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility |
perceptive
self-appraisal; fair and balanced account of involvement, accurately
and coherently written; all points covered and some in considerable
depth |
extremely
insightful detailed and well-rounded account; balanced and informed;
written in engaging, accurate and stylistically appropriate style |
| |
TOTAL MARKS AWARDED.........
|
CONCLUSION
This WebQuest has introduced learners to an English-speaking country,
familiarising them with its geography, climate, touristic features and
life style, by means of English-language resources on the WWW. They
have had to collaborate to design and present an original itinerary,
as well as work individually on letter and postcard writing skills in
English, requiring original synthesis and organization of data. They
have also engaged self-appraisal skills.
|