|
|
|
|
|
Group score |
Teacher score |
Quality of research |
Research carried out with only a few information and with the continuous help of the teacher. |
Research carried out with enough information and some help of the teacher. |
Research carried out with a lot of information with only a few help from the teacher. |
Research carried out with a lot of information from many resources. The teacher acts only as a guide. |
f |
f |
Quality of product |
The project satisfies one of the following criteria: creative, accurate information, neatness and grammatical correctness.
|
The project satisfies two of the following criteria: creative, accurate information, neatness and grammatical correctness. |
The project satisfies three of the following criteria: creative, accurate information, neatness and grammatical correctness. |
The project satisfies all of the following criteria: creative, accurate information, neatness and grammatical correctness. |
f |
f |
Quality of presentation |
The presentation satisfies one of these criteria: organized, interesting, involves all group members and is delivered competently. |
The presentation satisfies two of these criteria: organized, interesting, involves all group members and is delivered competently. |
The presentation satisfies three of these criteria: organized, interesting, involves all group members and is delivered competently. |
The presentation satisfies all of these criteria: organized, interesting, involves all group members and is delivered competently. |
f |
f |
Quality of collaboration |
Individualistic work without connection between the sections. |
Global collaboration and global group work is shown. |
A good group work is shown all through the project. |
An interest in working in group and solving conflicts is shown all through the project. |
f |
f |
Final score: |
___/16 |
___/16 |